How did we (Homo Sapiens) survive longer than all the rest? Multiple theories are debated, but one fact that is generally accepted, one key trait modern humans had that none of the others possessed was the curiosity and courage to cross open water. Neanderthals were stronger, more disciplined, with far more experience and yet I believe it was our curiosity that enabled us to outlast them and dominate every other species since.
The drive to explore is a childhood instinct rooted in the human brain, a brain that develops unlike any other. Only the human brain continues to grow almost four times its birth weight, allowing us to develop as much from our experiences exploring our environment as from survival instincts pre-wired in our inherited genes. This necessitates a thirst to learn and a strong sense of observation, things every child does continuously. In a world full of constant change, the ability to adapt is a decisive advantage and the human mind was made to do just that. It's still apparent today - those that get ahead have the drive to improve themselves and the courage to take a chance charting unknown waters.
I am not the type of person that shaves everyday, only the days I need to. Occasionally I would have a beard started, only to be shaved off a day or two later. One morning, my youngest son asked me to let my beard grow so I would look like Obi Wan. I never pictured myself as a 'beard person', but it has now been over a year and I still have one. Maybe it is OK though, one of my favorite architects had a beard - Antoni Gaudi. He was certainly someone willing to explore new methods and unseen architecture.
Other architects of his time designed buildings by assembling variations on Euclidean geometric shapes... squares, rectangles, triangles. Gaudi pushed further, exploring catenary curves by using weighted inverted models to derive building forms based on the fundamental principles of gravitation. New methods and tools can reveal new ideas, but it is not a given. A good example is the latest type of software embraced by the architectural community - Building Information Modeling (BIM). Revolutionizing the power of Computer Aided Design (CAD), transforming line drawings into building components imbedded with construction and performance data, this new type of software has enabled a far more sophisticated method to analyze and predict the success of a future building.
But, it comes at a cost. I host an annual design competition for high school students and the experience has taught me something unexpected about architectural software. Reviewing the student submissions, with the varying levels of ability accounted for by using a large sampling of students from the same class, it becomes apparent the influence differing design software used by each school has on the end product. What I have found is that students working with traditional software or even drawing by hand, come up with more creative solutions than those working with this next generation software. The reason BIM stifles creativity, I believe, is in the way it operates.
When an architect wants a wall to have a window, the traditional software creates it from scratch by drawing lines or in the case of three dimensional modeling software, openings are carved out by extruding lines. In contrast, BIM inserts a window by selecting one from a menu of manufactured products. This may work well to know what is available in the marketplace, but it does nothing to move the marketplace forward discovering new window forms and by extension new building forms as a whole. This is a critical point and a marked change in the design process, largely ignored by an industry focused on streamlining drawing time and boosting productivity on the backend once a design is determined and the building is ready to go to bid, constructed and maintained after occupied. These efficiencies are important, but in my own practice, I am not willing to do so at the sacrifice of creativity on the front end of the process - the heart of what an architect once represented.
There is a change occurring in the architectural profession, a shift toward facilitator, away from creator. Change is a fact of nature, just ask the Neanderthal what happens when you don't embrace it. But, blindly following without an understanding of which direction you are heading or what is sacrificed can be equally fateful. For me, exploring the unknown is in my DNA. I create best with the vast open sea of a blank sheet of paper, not by assembling and rearranging a predetermined set of objects. So I will continue to design from scratch (to borrow another metaphor from the stone age), it might take a little more time, but it makes full use of my most valuable tool - the highly evolved piece of engineering contained within our cranium. Drawing a window by hand affords the time for my curiosity to explore uncharted possibilities, something lost by the rush of a click and drop method.
